development KVS 5.5.0 discussion and poll

[Emilia]

On 5/26/2021 at 2:00 AM, Justin said:

Please please please implement this feature for the next update :-) !!!

There should be a poll for next update once the current 5.5.0 gets finalized.

Depends on the poll results, the features will be added

but I'm not expecting it to happen this year tbh

[Tech Support]

19 minutes ago, Emilia said:

but I'm not expecting it to happen this year tbh

Last couple of month we were busy with some crucial changes in KVS architecture, so this was the cause of new development slowdown.

[Alex]

Hi guys!

I will describe my idea for developing tags on your engine. I have 600 tags on one of my paysites right now. And when I add new content, it is very difficult and long to check the appropriate tags for it. But this process could be significantly easier if there was some smart sorting. For example, there are tags that will definitely stand together on the content unit, since they mean the same thing (but they should be as a separate directory on the site becuase SEO), for example: 2160p /4k / ultra hd.  It would be cool if they could be combined into a mini group and select a key tag that will be visible in the admin panel when adding or editing content, and the rest would be automatically put together with it.

[Tech Support]

Sorry, but we don't have any similar concept like this in KVS and we won't be able to add this feature in the nearest future, it looks like a very custom requirement.

[Diego12220]

On 12/8/2020 at 9:25 AM, Scumtron said:

HLS and S3 protocol made for each other, it is desirable to implement them together.

totally agree on this one)

[Diego12220]

On 5/28/2021 at 3:33 AM, Tech Support said:

Last couple of month we were busy with some crucial changes in KVS architecture, so this was the cause of new development slowdown.

and that's totally ok, because when you are concentrated on one thing it gets better rather then more in a time
I think you got the idea

[leonrak]

After updating to 5.5.0 I notice a bug or strange behavior of KVS.

 

In content feedback section if you click on the video title, It wont go to video edit page or the video URL on website, It just refresh the page. That makes no sense

[Tech Support]

Please check this post, this is the new way of how admin panel filtering works:

 

[davex]

On 12/19/2020 at 4:40 AM, Tech Support said:

There is a workaround for this with using rsync or NFS mount, so not something we won't to consider as other features do not have workarounds.

 

The code {{$item.xxx}} is for using in list blocks, for profile you should be using {{$data.is_trusted}}, for video / album pages if you want to display this for the user who uploaded video is {{$data.user.is_trusted}}

thanks. 

 

I want to show the verified text inside the profile in: /my/ I have tried the 2 codes but it does not show how could I put it?

 

I also have this code to show not verified but it does not work, it would be correct:

$data.not_trusted}}

[Tech Support]

{{$data.is_trusted}} should work inside member_profile_view block template.

{{$data.not_trusted}} - there is no such variable.

[davex]

3 hours ago, Tech Support said:

{{$data.is_trusted}} should work inside member_profile_view block template.

{{$data.not_trusted}} - there is no such variable.

Perfect!

{{$data.not_trusted}} - there is no such variable.

😅 I wanted to know if there is any way to show the same thing but if it is not verified that a text or an X appears.

 

[Tech Support]

8 hours ago, davex said:

😅 I wanted to know if there is any way to show the same thing but if it is not verified that a text or an X appears.

You can render it like this:

{{if $data.is_trusted!=1}}Not trusted{{/if}}

 

[davex]

On 12/10/2021 at 2:31 PM, Tech Support said:

You can render it like this:

{{if $data.is_trusted!=1}}Not trusted{{/if}}

 

Perfect thanks!

 

It works very well, now I am putting it in header in the menu, I have tried all the mentioned codes but they work but it shows the 2 options verified + not verified both together.

[Tech Support]

On 12/11/2021 at 6:03 PM, davex said:

It works very well, now I am putting it in header in the menu, I have tried all the mentioned codes but they work but it shows the 2 options verified + not verified both together.

If you want to show for the current user (the user that is logged in), then you should use the value from user's session:

$smarty.session.is_trusted

{{if $smarty.session.is_trusted!=1}}Not trusted{{else}}Trusted{{/if}}

[Helmuts DNMUM.com]

On 12/10/2020 at 10:50 AM, Tech Support said:

Live streaming is not something that is on our radar at all.

Hi, has anything changed 2 years later?

I am really curious about live streaming, and would absolutelly love to stream on our tube site.

Pluses:

• saves time on downloading & re-uploading the recorded stream
• all the traffic can be directed to the kvs (instead of other sites where the stream goes to)
• live comments are Gold

tx

.. if not > what would be the best alternative solutions? thank you

[Tech Support]

1 hour ago, Helmuts DNMUM.com said:

Hi, has anything changed 2 years later?

Nothing changed. We still have a huge plan to re-do everything in KVS, this will take us 2-3 years. Such features as live streaming will not be considered, as they are not demanded with majority of our customers.

[Helmuts DNMUM.com]

31 minutes ago, Tech Support said:

Nothing changed. We still have a huge plan to re-do everything in KVS, this will take us 2-3 years. Such features as live streaming will not be considered, as they are not demanded with majority of our customers.

No problem ay all. And, thank you for a quick reply. Then we will proceed operating as before :)

Best wishes, H

[Adulty Webmaster]

For project backups, could yo maybe add a feature to backup to an external cloud service, for example google drives?

[Tech Support]

4 hours ago, Adulty Webmaster said:

For project backups, could yo maybe add a feature to backup to an external cloud service, for example google drives?

Yes, we have this in our mind already.

[Alex]

Hi guys! A ask you to unify the site admin panel and add the existing functionality for other similar objects. In particular:

1. "Content Sourcers" for Models and Posts

2. "Description" and "Main content" for Content Sources (what you have for Posts)

3. Choosing "Post Type" same as choosing "Group" by Content Sources (NOT drop down menu). And may be rename Post Types to Post Groups.

Thank you!

[Tech Support]

On 11/18/2022 at 6:20 PM, Alex said:

1. "Content Sourcers" for Models and Posts

Support for content sources will be added for posts soon (maybe 6.1 already). This is part of nextgen refactgoring that will happen automatically due to code generalization.

For models we do not see logic to connect models and content sources. But the nextgen framework will allow your customize this with 2 lines of code.

On 11/18/2022 at 6:20 PM, Alex said:

2. "Description" and "Main content" for Content Sources (what you have for Posts)

Description is already in content sources. Main content is not needed, as content source supports custom fields and you can enable one of them and name it "Main content".

On 11/18/2022 at 6:20 PM, Alex said:

3. Choosing "Post Type" same as choosing "Group" by Content Sources (NOT drop down menu). And may be rename Post Types to Post Groups.

This will also happen automatically with nextgen refactoring when posts are migrated to nextgen framework.

[Alex]

On 11/21/2022 at 9:25 AM, Tech Support said:

Support for content sources will be added for posts soon (maybe 6.1 already)

It sounds great. What are your approximate deadlines for 6.1?
And it would be just perfect if you added Screenshots also for Posts!

[Tech Support]

On 11/23/2022 at 8:45 AM, Alex said:

It sounds great. What are your approximate deadlines for 6.1?

We don't have deadlines, not possible to fulfill them.

On 11/23/2022 at 8:45 AM, Alex said:

And it would be just perfect if you added Screenshots also for Posts!

Do you mean with resize option? Yes, this would be possible with the new API as well, as we are planning to extend custom file fields to restrict file types and also have ability to resize them to the desired size.

[Alex]

Guys, could you add a URL Display Name field for Contens Sources. See my screenshots. The referral link needs to be hidden and it is better to set the necessary beautiful name for it.
Of course there are custom fields, but they are very low, and it would be perfect to have this field next to the URL field so that editors do not forget to fill it in.

[Tech Support]

14 hours ago, Alex said:

Guys, could you add a URL Display Name field for Contens Sources. See my screenshots. The referral link needs to be hidden and it is better to set the necessary beautiful name for it.

For some reason we don't like the idea. Why not just using title for this? Sounds more logical than separate field.