Tech Support
-
Posts
1,796 -
Joined
-
Days Won
336
Posts posted by Tech Support
-
-
SEO is not indexing KVS video files, because they are protected, so no sense to keep them in any specific filenames. Anyway it is not technically possible, and would not be possible in future as we will have to rewrite all KVS due to that.
-
1
-
-
This will be added as a part of new KVS player in future. AT the moment we have no progress on this.
-
In KVS terms we use "sort" to indicate the "ordering" of some objects, but I guess you probably mean some kind of grouping / categorization.
Models do support categories and tags, and you can have filtering of model lists by categories for sure, similar to videos, but this is not coded into themes. You have to do some designing for this.
39 minutes ago, DeepOne said:Two main model groups/categories: Celebrities and Pornstars
These are likely model groups.
40 minutes ago, DeepOne said:Then I want to break the Celebrities group up into smaller sub groups such as: Actresses, Popstars, Kpop, etc.
These are likely categories, as only 1 level of grouping is possible. Because I guess a model can be both in Popstars and Kpop, this is not possible with groups.
Also since model blocks are switched to nextgen API, it will be soon possible to programmatically add some additional categorization, with just few changes and being applied to the whole KVS. For example it would be possible to add additional categorization level, for example Niches to models and allow specifying them separately from categories (if you don't want to use categories for that and model groups are not enough). However, we didn't yet migrate categorization admin panel GUI to nextgen, so this would not be possible at the moment.
42 minutes ago, DeepOne said:Also in the documentation it says that “Models” are essentially the same thing as “categories”. But that doesn’t seem to be accurate. If it were, shouldnt they have the same functionality and be able to be sorted in the same way categories are?
What you mean by this? What functionality is not possible with models, that is possible with categories?
42 minutes ago, DeepOne said:Or have pictures made automatically in the same way pictures are automatically made for categories?
How do you expect this to work please? For categories the plugin to autogenerate a thumb will take one of the video thumbs for videos of that category. If we use the same approach for models, it would make sense only for few % of thumbs that randomly and luckily depict model in stable view. The rest majority of model thumbs would be some blurred scene from some angle where you can't clearly see who is depicted and even several different people on the scene.
-
7 hours ago, Ashl said:
When you say unique views, how many time per day can a single person be counted across the entire website? Is it once per video, or maybe once per uploader?
1 unique IP per 24 per video is considered as a unique view.
7 hours ago, Ashl said:Is there any protection against someone buying traffic and sending it to a specific video link? Either real or fake traffic.
No, there is no any protection except IP unique. In theory someone would be able to use proxies and fake the unique views. The feature is not designed for monetization, but it is designed for motivating users to share their videos and earn some tokens, that can later be used on your site for purchasing some premium access.
What you probably need is some tool for purchasing traffic and paying for it, such tools normally have analytics and protection that can be used together to decide about payments. For example if the analytics decides that the quality of some traffic is bad, it should reduce payment rates for this traffic.
-
The video height is not known at this point and makes no sense to adjust font based on it. The watermark image should be the same for all video sizes, but then you should specify Watermark max width field in video format settings to make sure it will be resized to the same visual height.
-
"uploadDate": "{{$storage.video_view_video_view.post_date|date_format:"%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S+00:00"}}",Something like this I guess.
-
Please create support ticket.
-
No, there is no technical way to restrict that, because all screenshots are stored in the same structure and having just filenames not possible to tell which videos are private and which are public.
-
Then please create support ticket.
-
This is likely because your server doesn't have Apache installed and .htaccess file is not used at all. Please check with your server support about this.
-
Do you have Apache installed? I think this may be because you don't have Apache and your rewrites are at Nginx level. Then you need to check with Nginx documentation on how to customize 404 error, as we only know for Apache.
-
Ubuntu repository still uses Sphinx 2.2:
sudo apt-get install sphinxsearch Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Reading state information... Done sphinxsearch is already the newest version (2.2.11-8).
We are not able to test the latest version due to that.
Also our addon is using some kind of official PHP API from here:
https://github.com/sphinxsearch/sphinx/blob/master/api/sphinxapi.php
This file was last updated 8 years ago, so it looks like it may not support recent sphinx versions.
-
1
-
-
This should happen automatically by default.
-
Should be these:
RewriteRule ^latest-updates/([0-9]+)/$ /latest-videos/$1/ [R=301,L,QSA] RewriteRule ^latest-updates/$ /latest-videos/ [R=301,L,QSA] -
KVS only supports MySQL database.
-
In KVS architecture all background tasks that work with content files are done in 1 thread to avoid concurrent access to files.
-
Please go to Website UI -> Install new theme GUI.
-
It supports, but not exposed in theme:
https://www.kvs-demo.com/members/?q=demo
What you need to do is to go to Website UI -> Pages -> Community -> Block "Members" and enable var_search = q parameter. Then go one level up to Community page template and add this under <div class="filter">:
<div class="row"> <label for="search_members_query" class="field-label">Username</label> <input id="search_members_query" name="q" class="textfield" value="{{$smarty.get.q}}"/> </div>
-
1
-
-
No, it won't, unless you enable auto-delete feature in some grabbers that provide list of deleted URLs from their site.
-
1
-
-
Yes, absolutely possible.
-
1
-
-
If grabber allows grabbing multiple files, you need to change Quality from "Best possible" to "Multiple".
If there is no "Multiple" option, then grabber can only grab 1 file, so no sense to upload it into multiple video formats in KVS.
-
1
-
-
4 hours ago, Eri said:
I think to fix this problem need to have the same video url at sitemap, video page head and body. ‘Don’t add any embed url’
This doesn't look to be true. When we removed embed URL from page, this didn't solve "video is not main content" issue. The issue was solved only after we changed /videos/ URL pattern to /video/.
-
Sorry, we don't want to add such an option because other tube sites have it, this is not a reasoning. We have a lot of other much more important work to do.
-
Yes, but it doesn't mean KVS should be installed on the same server, or on the same domain. KVS needs to be installed somewhere for this plugin. This info is for Wordpress guys, who may think they don't need KVS installation for this plugin to work.
How to use SphinxSearch with KVS for better search and related videos performance
in Educational Series
Posted
I think you need to ask this on Sphinx forum to have chance to get qualified response.