Jump to content

Google Indexing Tubesite Pages


Jim

Recommended Posts

Normally it is expected that mobile test will produce worse results, as they are emulating slow mobile network in their tests.

The most obvious thing I can see without any additional details is "Serve images in next-gen formats", which is typically because of not using WebP for screenshots. Please create support ticket, we can confirm that. Then a fix could be possible to make results better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, viper said:

Hello, why don't head tags in kvs?

It's good for seo

The on page SEO check by seobility I run periodically identifies some issues with headings structure in general and H1 headings in particular. I've previously considered this to be a secondary issue and not attempted to correct. As you suggest it probably is detrimental for Google indexing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Tech Support said:

Unfortunately we don't see anything more easy to do, you have to adjust design or do any of the enhancement proposed by this tool. It is not easy to get 100 on mobile for this tool, you have to do a lot of effort to get this.

Noted. What design adjustments and enhancements did you do the the demo to get the mobile performance result 95 you previously reported?

image.thumb.png.4a50355316958a3ec9fd2d50e6e1fe2a.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Jim said:

What design adjustments and enhancements did you do the the demo to get the mobile performance result 95 you previously reported?

We did not do any adjustments, this is the behavior of default theme design without using any external scripts or advertising.

I mean the default theme is already designed in a perfect way. But when you start adding advertising, or altering theme (e.g. adding more blocks to some pages), it will receive lower score, and this is normal. For example some themes may render additional blocks on index page, which make the page more heavy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Tech Support said:

We did not do any adjustments, this is the behavior of default theme design without using any external scripts or advertising.

I mean the default theme is already designed in a perfect way. But when you start adding advertising, or altering theme (e.g. adding more blocks to some pages), it will receive lower score, and this is normal. For example some themes may render additional blocks on index page, which make the page more heavy.

You appear to be saying that due to perfect design the KVS default theme without any external scripts, advertising or any changes to templates will always achieve mobile performance 95%. Is this correct?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, we have optimized everything possible by default and you can see the result here:

https://pagespeed.web.dev/analysis/https-www-kvs-demo-com-video-240-ne-yo-beautiful-monster/sx7z1mp0j9?form_factor=mobile

We are also looking into switching to using AVIF instead of WebP, as this will give even smaller image sizes, which is particularly important for player images on video pages.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/17/2024 at 7:48 AM, Tech Support said:

Yes, we have optimized everything possible by default and you can see the result here:

https://pagespeed.web.dev/analysis/https-www-kvs-demo-com-video-240-ne-yo-beautiful-monster/sx7z1mp0j9?form_factor=mobile

We are also looking into switching to using AVIF instead of WebP, as this will give even smaller image sizes, which is particularly important for player images on video pages.

Any ETA on the format change? I have been manually converting images to use on model screenshots, but the video thumbnails are stuck with jpeg for now it seems, which puts a considerable amount of load on the pages. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For video screenshots it already supports WEBP. We are adding AVIF support right at this moment, but we found that it is not feasible to use it for thumbs. Its creation costs x10 times longer than WEBP, and it gives very slight improvement for small images. But for player images it should work well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...